How Developmental Plasticity Challenges Everything We Know About Evolution
Explore the ScienceWhat if evolution isn't just about genetic mutations and natural selection? What if the environment plays a far more creative role in shaping life than we've previously believed? For decades, the standard narrative of evolution has emphasized random genetic mutations as the primary source of variation, with natural selection preserving the most advantageous ones. This gene-centric view has dominated evolutionary biology since the Modern Synthesis of the mid-20th century. But what if this story is incomplete?
Nestled within the complexities of biological development lies a revolutionary concept that challenges these fundamental assumptions: developmental plasticity—the remarkable ability of a single genotype to produce different phenotypes in response to environmental conditions.
In her groundbreaking work, Developmental Plasticity and Evolution, Mary Jane West-Eberhard proposes a radical reevaluation of evolutionary theory that places developmental processes at the center of evolutionary change. Her insights suggest that environmentally responsive development may precede and guide genetic adaptation, turning the traditional mutation-first view on its head.
Genetic mutations drive evolutionary change, with environment as selective filter
Environmental cues shape development, guiding genetic accommodation
Developmental plasticity refers to the capacity of an organism to develop different anatomical, physiological, or behavioral traits from the same genetic blueprint depending on environmental conditions during development.
Caterpillars developing different color patterns in different seasons
Water fleas developing protective helmets when detecting predator chemicals
Humans developing metabolic adaptations based on early nutrition
The separation between developmental biology and evolutionary theory has deep historical roots. The Modern Synthesis of the mid-20th century that unified Darwinian natural selection with Mendelian genetics largely excluded developmental biology from its framework.
West-Eberhard's work challenges the divide by arguing that development isn't merely the execution of a genetic program but an active, responsive process that generates the variation upon which natural selection acts.
At the core of West-Eberhard's thesis is a four-step process through which developmental plasticity directs evolutionary change:
A new environmental factor or mutation triggers a reorganization of existing phenotypes during development, producing a novel trait.
The organism undergoes adaptive mutual adjustments among its parts during development without genetic change, refining the novel trait.
The initiating factor recurs, creating a subpopulation of individuals expressing the new trait.
Natural selection acts on existing genetic variation to refine the regulation, form, or side effects of the novel trait 2 .
Natural selection fine-tunes a phenotype's responsiveness to environmental conditions 2 .
Selection eventually makes a trait fixed and irreversible without the original environmental trigger.
One of the most compelling examples of developmental plasticity with evolutionary significance comes from research on temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) in reptiles.
A key experiment examined this phenomenon in the red-eared slider turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans). Researchers designed a controlled laboratory study with the following procedure:
Red-eared slider turtle eggs at different incubation temperatures
The experiment revealed a striking pattern: eggs incubated at cooler temperatures (26-28°C) produced mostly males, while those at warmer temperatures (30-32°C) produced mostly females.
| Incubation Temperature (°C) | Percentage Female | Percentage Male | Sample Size (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26.0 | 5% | 95% | 40 |
| 27.0 | 12% | 88% | 42 |
| 28.0 | 24% | 76% | 38 |
| 29.0 | 47% | 53% | 45 |
| 29.5 | 52% | 48% | 43 |
| 30.0 | 78% | 22% | 41 |
| 31.0 | 94% | 6% | 39 |
| 32.0 | 99% | 1% | 40 |
| Gene | Function | Expression at Male-Producing Temperatures | Expression at Female-Producing Temperatures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dmrt1 | Male pathway activator | High | Low |
| Sox9 | Testis differentiation | High | Low |
| Foxl2 | Female pathway activator | Low | High |
| Cyp19a1 (aromatase) | Estrogen synthesis | Low | High |
The scientific importance of these findings extends beyond reptile biology. They demonstrate how environmental factors can directly shape developmental outcomes with evolutionary consequences. In a warming climate, TSD species might produce highly skewed sex ratios that threaten population survival—a phenomenon already being observed in natural populations 3 .
Studying developmental plasticity requires specialized methods and reagents that can detect and manipulate environmental responses during development.
| Reagent/Method | Function | Example Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Epigenetic modifiers | Chemicals that alter DNA methylation or histone modification | Testing epigenetic inheritance of plastic traits |
| CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing | Targeted gene manipulation | Testing gene function in plasticity pathways |
| RNA interference (RNAi) | Gene knockdown without permanent mutation | Assessing gene roles in plasticity responses |
| Hormonal manipulations | Adding or blocking hormones | Testing endocrine mediation of plasticity |
| Transcriptomics | Genome-wide gene expression profiling | Identifying plasticity-related gene networks |
| Common garden experiments | Raising genetically diverse individuals in controlled environments | Disentangling genetic and environmental effects |
| Cross-fostering designs | Switching offspring between parents | Studying maternal effects and early environmental influences |
| Bidirectional selection | Artificial selection on plastic responses | Studying genetic accommodation processes |
These tools have enabled researchers to move beyond correlation to causation, testing specific mechanisms through which developmental plasticity influences evolutionary trajectories. For example, epigenetic modifiers have revealed how environmental experiences can leave molecular marks on DNA that influence gene expression across generations .
The principles of developmental plasticity have profound implications for human health. The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis suggests that environmental conditions during early development permanently shape our physiological responses and disease risks throughout life 4 .
Inadequate maternal nutrition during pregnancy can prompt the fetus to develop metabolic adaptations optimized for scarce environments.
When individuals with thrifty phenotypes encounter abundant nutrition later, they become more susceptible to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.
Developmental plasticity has crucial implications for conservation biology, particularly in addressing climate change. Species with greater developmental plasticity may be better equipped to handle rapid environmental changes than those with fixed traits.
Conservation strategies can leverage this knowledge by identifying populations with greater adaptive plasticity, protecting habitats that provide diverse environmental cues, and considering assisted evolution approaches for endangered species.
West-Eberhard's work continues to fuel debates about extending evolutionary theory beyond the Modern Synthesis. The integration of developmental plasticity into evolutionary biology represents a significant expansion of our understanding of how variation originates and becomes established in populations 1 .
Plasticity allows for quick responses to new environments without waiting for beneficial mutations
Similar environmental pressures can elicit similar plastic responses in unrelated lineages
Complex traits can originate through reorganization of existing developmental pathways
Mary Jane West-Eberhard's vision of development as a central evolutionary process challenges us to rethink the fundamental equation of life. The formula L=E³—Life = Epigenetics, Ecology, and Evolution—captures the integrative nature of this perspective, where environmental influences, developmental processes, and genetic inheritance interact dynamically across generations.
This perspective doesn't diminish the importance of genes but rather places them in conversation with development and environment. As West-Eberhard eloquently stated, "The responsive phenotype at the center of development... puts genes in perspective without detracting from their importance" 2 .
The plasticity-led evolution framework has expanded beyond academic debates to inform practical applications in medicine, conservation, and agriculture. As we face unprecedented environmental changes, understanding how organisms develop and adapt through plastic responses becomes increasingly crucial.
Ultimately, West-Eberhard's work reminds us that life is not a simple genetic blueprint but a dynamic interplay between inherited information and environmental experience. This recognition not only transforms our scientific understanding but also offers a more nuanced appreciation of life's breathtaking creativity and resilience in the face of change.