From Evolutionary Puzzles to Ocean Floor Walkers
Picture a fish so unconventional that it swims like other fish in its youth, then gradually collapses onto its side, with one eye migrating across its head to join the other. This isn't marine mythology—this is the remarkable reality of flatfishes, including flounder, halibut, and sole.
These biological marvels have captivated scientists since Darwin's era, challenging our understanding of evolutionary processes with their extraordinary asymmetrical body plan and specialized adaptations for life on the ocean floor.
Flatfishes like this flounder have evolved a unique body plan perfectly adapted for life on the seafloor.
Flatfishes represent one of evolution's most dramatic transformations. Beginning life as conventional, bilaterally symmetrical larvae swimming upright in the water column, they undergo a spectacular metamorphosis where one eye migrates to the opposite side of the head, the skull twists and remodels, and the fish adapts to living on its side on the ocean bottom.
This bizarre body plan has proven enormously successful—nearly 800 species thrive across the world's oceans, from shallow coastal waters to the deep sea. Recent research combining genomics, developmental biology, and biomechanics has not only uncovered surprising truths about their evolutionary origins but has also revealed how their unique adaptations might inspire future technologies.
For decades, scientists have grappled with a fundamental question: did all flatfishes evolve from a single common ancestor, or did their distinctive body plan emerge multiple times independently? This question of monophyly versus polyphyly has divided ichthyologists and evolutionary biologists, with evidence seeming to support both sides at different points in scientific history.
The traditional view, supported by morphological studies, held that all flatfishes shared a common ancestor—that they were a monophyletic group. This perspective pointed to their shared asymmetric features as evidence of a single evolutionary origin. However, as molecular techniques advanced, this consensus began to crumble.
Single vs. multiple origins of flatfish asymmetry
Multiple DNA-based studies produced conflicting results, particularly regarding the position of Psettodes, the most "primitive" flatfish genus. Some analyses found Psettodes more closely related to symmetrical percoid fish than to other flatfishes, challenging the single-origin hypothesis and suggesting flatfishes might be polyphyletic—their distinctive body plan having evolved more than once 3 .
This scientific controversy intensified as competing research groups debated the issue. Betancur-R. et al. maintained support for flatfish monophyly based on extensive genetic data sets, while Campbell et al. consistently found evidence for separate origins. The resolution of this debate would have profound implications for understanding how such radical morphological innovations evolve—whether they represent a single improbable event or a more accessible evolutionary pathway that could be traversed multiple times.
The flatfish origin debate took a dramatic turn in 2021 when a landmark study published in Nature Genetics presented compelling genomic evidence supporting the polyphyletic hypothesis. Researchers analyzed the genomes of 11 flatfish species representing 9 of the 14 Pleuronectiforme families, providing an unprecedented window into flatfish evolutionary history 4 .
Their findings were striking: the analysis consistently placed Psettodes erumei (representing the suborder Psettodoidei) in a clade with non-flatfish perciform species like Toxotes chatareus (archerfish) and Polydactylus sextarius (polydactylid), while the remaining flatfishes (suborder Pleuronectoidei) formed a separate sister clade 4 . This phylogenetic separation strongly indicates that Pleuronectoidei and Psettodoidei arose independently from different percoid ancestors.
| Feature | Pleuronectoidei | Psettodoidei |
|---|---|---|
| Eye Migration | Extensive | Less extensive |
| Spinous Rays | Absent | Present |
| Skin Folds Around Eyes | Present | Absent |
| Dorsal Fin Insertion | Variable | Posterior |
| Evolutionary Relationship | Closer to each other | Closer to percoids |
Table 1: Key Differences Between Pleuronectoidei and Psettodoidei
The genomic evidence was further strengthened by analysis of chromosomal rearrangements, which showed that Psettodes shared specific chromosome changes with the symmetrical percoids rather than with other flatfishes. This provided independent confirmation of the phylogenetic results 4 . The morphological resemblance between Psettodes and percoids had been noted by ichthyologists for decades—some had even described Psettodes as simply an "asymmetric percoid"—but now there was robust genomic evidence to support this interpretation.
This polyphyletic origin suggests the flatfish body plan—while appearing extraordinarily specialized—may represent an evolutionarily accessible adaptation that arose multiple times in response to the ecological opportunities available on the seafloor.
While the evolutionary origins of flatfishes fascinate biologists, their peculiar locomotion has captured the attention of biomechanics researchers. Unlike most fish that swim using body undulations or fin flapping, flatfishes have developed a unique method of benthic locomotion that resembles "walking" across the seafloor.
In 2019, biologist Alice Gibb and her team at Northern Arizona University conducted a groundbreaking study to unravel the mechanics of this unusual movement. They focused on understanding how flatfishes use their dorsal and anal fins to generate movement while minimizing disturbance to the substrate 8 .
Flatfishes use their dorsal and anal fins in a coordinated wave-like motion to "walk" across the seafloor.
The researchers collected more than 30 individual flatfishes representing six different species—Pacific sand sole, English sole, starry flounder, slender sole, butter sole, and rock sole—from Puget Sound waters.
The fish were housed in seawater tanks at Friday Harbor Laboratories, providing a controlled environment for observation.
The team recorded the fishes' movements using high-speed video cameras, capturing details imperceptible to the naked eye. This technology allowed them to slow down the motion for frame-by-frame analysis.
Researchers analyzed 67 sequences of fish walking, bounding, and swimming, carefully tracking the precise movements of the fins and body 8 .
The high-speed video analysis revealed surprising findings about flatfish locomotion:
Previously undocumented in vertebrates
| Locomotion Type | Number of Sequences Analyzed | Primary Fins Used | Substrate Disturbance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Walking | 37 | Dorsal and anal | Minimal |
| Bounding | 18 | Dorsal, anal, and caudal | Moderate |
| Swimming | 12 | Caudal and body undulation | Significant |
Table 2: Analysis of Flatfish Locomotion Sequences
The research team concluded that flatfishes are structurally and functionally unique among vertebrates in their ability to move across the ocean floor using this specialized walking gait. This discovery not only expands our understanding of vertebrate locomotion but also opens possibilities for bio-inspired engineering.
Flatfish research employs diverse methodologies from genomics to biomechanics. Below are key approaches and their applications in unraveling the mysteries of these unusual fish.
| Research Method | Primary Function | Application Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Stable Isotope Analysis | Determines trophic position and dietary patterns | Tracing food web changes in invaded ecosystems 1 |
| Genome Sequencing | Decodes genetic blueprint and evolutionary relationships | Resolving phylogenetic debates about flatfish origins 4 |
| High-Speed Videography | Captures rapid motion for detailed biomechanical analysis | Studying fin-based "walking" locomotion 8 |
| Geometric Morphometrics | Quantifies and analyzes shape variations | Tracking cranial asymmetry evolution across species 5 |
| RNA Expression Analysis | Measures gene activity during development | Identifying genes involved in eye migration 4 |
Table 3: Essential Research Approaches in Flatfish Biology
These tools have enabled researchers to make significant advances in understanding flatfish biology. Stable isotope analysis, for instance, was crucial in a recent Susquehanna River study that revealed how invasive flathead catfish have disrupted local food webs, causing native species to shift their diets and feeding strategies 1 .
Meanwhile, geometric morphometrics has helped quantify how integration—the coordinated evolution of multiple traits—facilitated the rapid evolution of cranial asymmetry in flatfishes 5 .
Beyond their fascinating biology, flatfishes play significant roles in marine ecosystems and face growing conservation challenges. Some species, like the flathead catfish, have become invasive in certain river systems, with profound ecological consequences 1 .
A recent study in the Susquehanna River documented how introduced flathead catfish have risen to become apex predators, occupying the highest trophic position in the food web. Using stable isotope analysis, researchers found that these invaders force native species like smallmouth bass and channel catfish to alter their diets and feeding behaviors, creating broader dietary overlaps and potentially destabilizing the entire ecosystem 1 .
Invasive flatfish species can disrupt entire aquatic ecosystems.
This research demonstrated that the impacts of invasive flatfish species extend beyond simple predation—they can fundamentally reshape food webs and alter how energy flows through river systems. The findings illustrate the delicate balance of aquatic ecosystems and how the introduction of a single voracious predator can trigger cascading effects throughout the biological community.
Meanwhile, fisheries scientists are working to improve conservation of flatfish populations. Organizations like REEF are collecting valuable data through citizen science programs, enabling better assessment of species like Hogfish and informing sustainable management strategies 7 . These efforts highlight the importance of integrating scientific research with conservation practice to protect flatfish species and the ecosystems they inhabit.
Flatfishes, once described by naysayers as impossible within Darwinian gradual evolution, continue to reveal their secrets to persistent scientists. The once-baffling creatures have now been shown to be even more extraordinary than previously imagined—not one evolutionary innovation but two independent experiments in asymmetric living.
The polyphyletic origin revealed by genomic studies suggests the flatfish body plan represents an evolutionarily accessible solution to the challenges and opportunities of benthic life. Their unique walking locomotion, driven by coordinated fin movements, demonstrates how radically body plans can be transformed when species colonize new environments. These findings not only resolve long-standing scientific debates but also open new avenues for exploration.
Flatfish locomotion inspires biomimetic underwater drones.
As technology advances, flatfish research continues to yield insights with unexpected applications. The same studies that reveal how flatfishes walk are now inspiring the design of biomimetic underwater drones capable of both swimming and walking across the seafloor 8 . Such "flatfish drones" could one day inspect underwater infrastructure, monitor marine environments, or explore inaccessible regions of the ocean—proving that sometimes nature's most bizarre creations can become templates for tomorrow's technologies.
The flatfish story exemplifies how scientific curiosity—fueled by increasingly sophisticated tools—can transform apparent evolutionary absurdities into comprehensible adaptations, while simultaneously providing practical insights and technological inspiration. These sideways swimmers continue to challenge our assumptions about evolution, locomotion, and the very definition of what a fish can be.